FAIR AND BALANCED. The Australian's opinion page, sometimes accused of being a playground for the Right, today features Democrats insider Glenn Milne, Tampa weeper Alison Broinowski ("this no longer seems a just society"), and fossil fuel fearmonger Frances MacGuire ("many people don't realise that burning fossil fuels for our energy needs also affects our health").
MacGuire's piece – she’s a senior member of the Greenpeace religion – is hysterical:
The smoke from fossil fuels contains two very different, but equally important, threats. First, the carbon dioxide emitted contributes to the greenhouse effect and is already disrupting the global climate system. For example, extreme weather events such as floods bring water-borne diseases as well as injury and death.
Fossil fuels cause floods! (By the way, when did people get the idea that "extreme" weather is something unnatural? Are floods a recent phenomenon?)
Second, air pollutants cause direct harm to the human body, exacerbating respiratory diseases such as pneumonia and asthma, and causing premature deaths.
Fossil fuels cause gasping!
Tony McMichael from the Australian National University's National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health … refers to an increase in deaths from heat waves and extreme weather events such as floods and bushfires. More ominously, he warns that infectious diseases that flourish in a warm and wet environment, such as mosquito-borne malaria, dengue fever, Ross River fever and viral encephalitis, could become more widespread around the world.
Fossil fuels cause malaria!
Which means that there could be a significant rise in public health and insurance expenditure, in treatment, vaccination and prevention, if climate change continues unabated.
Fossil fuels increase my insurance bill!
Heat stress on crops and cattle would lead to big losses in Australian agriculture. The likely loss of the Great Barrier Reef and our snow fields is already a grave concern in the tourism sector.
Fossil fuels hurt wheat, cows, fish, and snow!
Phasing out fossil fuels is not just about environmental and health protection. It makes economic sense and it creates jobs. Some jobs would be lost if we seriously addressed greenhouse gas emissions.
MacGuire exaggerates everything except the amount of jobs that would vanish were we to adopt the Kyoto Protocol. "Some" jobs?
According to the US Department of Energy, non-polluting wind energy provides about five times more jobs per dollar invested than coal power. Solar energy and the energy efficiency industry provide many more again.
And building a dam with shovels provides many more jobs than building it with earth-moving equipment.
This week in Johannesburg, more than 65,000 people are congregating for the Earth Summit. The eyes of the world will be fixed on Australia, the US and Canada, all of which have played obstructionist roles in climate negotiations during the 10 years since the previous Earth Summit in Rio.
Hooray for the Obstructionist Three!
It will take government policy changes and support to benefit from the opportunities of moving to a low-carbon, energy efficient future. If Howard really believed in personal responsibility for the health of future generations, he would have joined Britain's Tony Blair, Germany's Gerhard Schroder and Jacques Chirac of France at this week's Earth Summit.
What? And burn all that fossil fuel to get there?